Home Review Animal: A Cinematic Menagerie of Highs and Lows

Animal: A Cinematic Menagerie of Highs and Lows

by admin

“Animal” roars to life with a first half that catches the eye and piques curiosity. The narrative dances on the edge of intrigue, teasing the audience with glimpses of a story waiting to unfold. However, this initial promise crumbles in the second half, as the narrative loses its vitality and plunges into dullness. The abrupt shift in momentum leaves viewers yearning for the consistent engagement promised by the series.

The screenplay of “Animal” is a double-edged sword. It begins with confusion, throwing audiences into a labyrinth of disjointed scenes that demand patience. Yet, as the series progresses, the once perplexing narrative transforms into a straightforward story. This evolution might appease those seeking clarity, but for others, it raises questions about the initial need for such convolution.

The acting spectrum in “Animal” spans from excellent to subpar. While certain cast members deliver standout performances, others fall short of leaving a lasting impact. The inconsistency in acting prowess creates a narrative dissonance that, at times, disrupts the immersive experience the series attempts to craft.

One shining aspect of “Animal” is its background music (BGM). The score effectively elevates scenes, infusing tension and emotion where needed. However, it falls short of creating a proper symphony that resonates throughout the series. The potential for a memorable musical backdrop is present, but it never fully materializes, leaving the audience with a sense of unfulfilled sonic promise.

The action scenes, a crucial element in any series of this nature, present a mixed bag. While some sequences are convincing and choreographed with precision, others lack the proper treatment that would elevate them to memorable heights. The series struggles to find a consistent rhythm in its action, a vital component for sustaining the tension and engagement essential for this genre.

Ranbir Kapoor, in a pivotal role, brings his acting prowess to the forefront. His performance is a nuanced display of the character’s complexities. Rashmika Mandana, while delivering a credible performance, doesn’t always synchronize seamlessly with the series’ evolving tone. The acting landscape is varied, but as a whole, the series fails to offer a cohesive and immersive experience.

In conclusion, “Animal” is a cinematic menagerie that oscillates between highs and lows. Its first half captivates, only to be dulled by a lackluster second act. The confusion of the early screenplay evolves into a straightforward narrative, but not without leaving traces of a missed opportunity for a more compelling storytelling approach. The series is a symphony of acting, BGM, and action, but the dissonance among these elements prevents it from achieving the harmonious blend that could have made “Animal” a roaring success in the web series landscape.

You may also like


Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word :)